|  Login
 
   

Location: BlogsThinking Out Loud: A Christian's Reflections    
Posted by: Mike Smith 9/12/2008

Once upon a time (say as late as 1948), the terms "liberal" and "conservative" actually held clearly defined meaning. Conservatives generally regarded change or experimentation via government to be dangerous. They, therefore, sought to slow the pace and scope of change. Liberals for the most part believed the challenges of the time required enormous shifts in the role of government and so pushed for bold action. Nearly all political debates were fueled by this enormous difference in perspective.

Ah, it's enough to make one long for the good old days! Nowadays, it seems both so-called conservatives and liberals favor substantial governmental involvement in private and business life. They often differ over what government should do, but both assume government should work to cast American society in their preferred image. The terms "liberal" and "conservative" have been reduced to adjectives attached to particular issues.

That being the case, I propose we abandon both terms when describing ourselves to one another. Rather than "liberal" versus "conservative," I propose we use the following self-descriptors.

Research versus Soundbite--There is a great divide between those who dig in and do their homework on matters of law, constitutional history, war, peace, public health, and the rest of the great issues of our day and those who tend to make decisions on the basis of sound bites.

Open versus Reflexive--Some of us thrive on options. Others of us prefer to preclude some options from consideration before a discussion begins. Are you intrigued by challenges and ideas, or do you tend to react negatively?

Integrated versus Tribal--We live in a society composed of many ethnic, racial and language groups. Many of us take a tribal approach to the matter, insisting that all other groups either recognize the primacy of our tribe or become members of our tribe. A few even suggest that all other tribes should leave the country! Others seek to integrate the tribes, hoping to enrich the lives of all of us. 

My own bias, of course, is clear. I believe we would be better Christians and citizens if we committed ourselves to research, openness and integration. Such an approach would not lead us to the same conclusions on any given issue. It would, however, tend to transform us into serious persons, capable of thinking clearly for ourselves rather than being pushed to and fro by every headline.

The challenges of the 21st century are too great for "liberals" and "conservatives." Serious women and men, provided there are enough of them, may fashion a future worth having for our children, grandchildren and generations yet to come.

 

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (4)   Add Comment
Re: A Call to a Serious Life    By Tom Brown on 9/17/2008
Mike, you are right on target. The words have lost their meaning. Most of us are like the theoilogy professor, I forget his name, who said when asked if he was liberal or conservative, "I'm liberal when receiving, and conservative when giving."

Re: A Call to a Serious Life    By Thos. B. Fowler, Pastor Schuyler Baptist Church on 9/17/2008
I really love this meditation, and agree, wholeheartedly. Jesus calls us to think, and choose---not align ourselves with the local 'party' of Pharisees or Sadducees. Thank you...my ancestors were from Murfreesboro...had an acestor who was mayor of the town...his name: Thos. B. Fowler, and is buried in Evergreen Cemetery.
Regards to all our Tennessee brothers and sisters....

tbf [Schuyler, Virginia...home of the Waltons]

Re: A Call to a Serious Life    By Thos. B. Fowler on 9/17/2008
Forgot to add my email: tbfowler@embarqmail.com...

Peace.

tbf

Re: A Call to a Serious Life    By Mike L. Las Cruces, NM on 4/19/2009
JESUS IS LORD!

There are basically two types of people - collectivists or individualists.

"Collectivism is a form of anthropomorphism. It attempts to see a group of individuals as having a single identity similar to a person. ... Collectivism demands that the group be more important than the individual. It requires the individual to sacrifice himself for the alleged good of the group." -- Jeff Landauer and Joseph Rowlands

"Individualism regards man -- every man -- as an independent, sovereign entity who possesses an inalienable right to his own life, a right derived from his nature as a rational being. Individualism holds that a civilized society, or any form of association, cooperation or peaceful co-existence among men, can be achieved only on the basis of the recognition of individual rights -- and that a group, as such, has no rights other than the individual rights of its members." -- Ayn Rand

Freedomkeys.com; Collectivism versus Individualism
http://freedomkeys.com/collectivism.htm



Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 
 
 
       
    © 2007 FBC Murfreesboro   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use